1750s - Sioux arrive at Black Hills | Savages & Scoundrels
excellent historical records etc/
Sunday, August 16, 2015
Saturday, February 28, 2015
URBAN ASPIRINES: Milo Manara - Hugo Pratt : Indian Summer
URBAN ASPIRINES: Milo Manara - Hugo Pratt : Indian Summer: Creators Writer : Milo Manara, Hugo Pratt Artist : Milo Manara Hugo Pratt is a gifted writer, a natural born story...
Friday, January 16, 2015
Newspaper Rock: Cynthia Ann Parker in Comanche Moon
Newspaper Rock: Cynthia Ann Parker in Comanche Moon: The Comanche Moon mini-series portrayed the fate of Cynthia Ann Parker, a white woman captured by the Comanche. More correctly, it misport...
Newspaper Rock: Killing Custer was patriotic
Newspaper Rock: Killing Custer was patriotic: The patriots who killed Custer Indians fought against the U.S., but they also show great loyalty to the nation. Consider this: The Lakota ...
Newspaper Rock: Roanoke play must go on
Newspaper Rock: Roanoke play must go on: 'Lost Colony' returns to North Carolina's Outer Banks "The Lost Colony" production, which has been performed at the Wa...
Newspaper Rock: Comanches ruled an empire
Newspaper Rock: Comanches ruled an empire: How the Comanche won the west Raymond Seitz reviews Comanche Empire by Pekka Hamalainen By the start of the 19th century, the Comanche tri...
Wednesday, May 21, 2014
altenate histories for the Amerindians
http://www.dalecozort.com/AHNewsletter/Nov01/IndianVictories.htm
Excellent discussion of American indian wars...an possibilities of alteranate story lines,,,ala harry turtledove....
Pontiac's war succeeding would be a Huge historical change in a time line of Amaerica...
enjoy
=============
Max Bauer: Master Army Builder
Francisco De Lugo: War Captain of the Huastecs
Excellent discussion of American indian wars...an possibilities of alteranate story lines,,,ala harry turtledove....
Pontiac's war succeeding would be a Huge historical change in a time line of Amaerica...
enjoy
=============
Book Excerpt
American Indian Victories
The Introduction to a book-length collection of American Indian AH scenarios
By: Dale R. Cozort
Max Bauer: Master Army Builder
American Indians are a tricky subject for serious alternate history. On the one hand, they represent a very dramatic and colorful “lost cause”. On the other hand, there are good reasons that Indians have historically not been as popular as say the Confederate States of America as subjects of alternate history. First, they generally lost out against European encroachment for some very impressive and hard-to-reverse reasons. The large impersonal forces of history ran against the Indians to a far greater extent than they did against say the Axis in World War II, or the South in the American Civil War. Second, it is hard to do a realistic Indian alternate history that has much to do with the Indian tribes that most people have heard of, or with the picture most people have of Indians.
Why the Indians lost—Epidemics: Indian battlefield victories tended to be meaningless in the face of a cruel bit of arithmetic. In almost every case, contact with European settlers led to at least 100 years of relentless Indian population decline from European diseases—a decline that usually left those populations at a tiny fraction of their pre-contact levels. Think the equivalent of the European Black Death every fifteen to twenty years for a hundred to one hundred and fifty years and you get some idea of what Indian groups went through. The resulting population declines left even relatively lucky Indian tribes with somewhere between 10 and 25 percent of their pre-contact populations.
Those epidemics didn’t just kill off faceless, replaceable generic Indians. They killed experienced leaders and skilled craftsmen, and undoubtedly men of genius—artists and innovators. The impact of European disease on the Indians was so severe that many alternate history buffs simply write them off for that reason alone.
Why the Indians lost—The technology gap: The most technologically advanced and politically sophisticated of Indian groups were materially and politically thousands of years behind the European cultures they faced. Aztecs and Incas technologically and materially resembled—at best—the Assyrians of 1000 BC more than they did the Europeans of 1500 AD. There was a gap of at least 2500 years, and arguably as much as 5000 years, between the two groups of cultures in terms of how long they had been accumulating the tools and techniques of technologically advanced cultures. That gap was by no means across the board. Indians could and did show Europeans a thing or two in many areas of technology.
Unfortunately for the Indians, the technology gap also extended beyond the physical realm. Europeans had accumulated a much larger playbook of military and political strategies over the years than the Indians had, and that gap was probably just as important as the physical technology.
The technology gap had nothing to do with the intelligence of individual Indians or with the worth of Indian cultures. It came about for at least three reasons. First, Indians started out behind Old World humans because they came over with only part of Old World human culture. Pieces of technology and culture that were useful in cold climate made it. Things that weren’t didn’t make it to the New World. Second, Indians never caught up, and actually fell further and further behind in many ways because they moved into continents that were much smaller than the Old World complex of Asia, Africa and Europe. The smaller continents translated into fewer opportunities to find the right combination of factors that would allow high technology cultures to develop. Third, North and South America had far fewer animal resources to work with. By the time Indian cultures developed to the point where they might have domesticated animals, most of the best candidates--like North American horses and camels--had already died off.
Why the Indians lost—the Indian wars: American Indians were at a major disadvantage against Europeans from the start, but they often fought hard and well. They often, indeed almost always, lost their wars against European settlers and conquistadors because they were more worried about fighting old Indian enemies than about fighting Europeans. Try to think of a war between European settlers and Indians where no Indians fought on the side of the Europeans. There may be some, but I can’t think of any. Indians often fought each other for one European power or another even when no Europeans were present at the battles.
Indians came to the New World with a subset of the Old World human toolkit, a subset of Old World human genetic diversity, and very small subset of the diseases that afflicted Old World humans. As a result, when regular contact between the Old and New Worlds began again, Spaniards quickly seized the most heavily populated areas, like Mexico and Peru, and installed themselves as the top echelon of society. They found that position difficult to maintain because the people they ruled died off so quickly from European diseases.
Spain and other European colonizers imported African slaves to replace the missing workers. That made the problem even worse from the Indian point of view, because African ones like the really deadly types of malaria and yellow fever joined European diseases in the New World. In the worst hit areas, Indians were essentially wiped out. In other areas, populations dropped to 10 to 25 percent of pre-contact levels over a period of 150 to 200 years before bottoming out and starting to rise. In a very few areas, Indian populations appear to have actually grown throughout the period, or through most of it. I’ll look at those areas more carefully later.
The diseases that started in the more populated areas spread to less populated areas, leaving those areas much more open to European colonization. That colonization in turn brought more diseases, which made the process of colonization easier, which brought more diseases, which made colonization even easier...and so.
Finally, if someone starts looking seriously at the development of Indian societies, they realize that many if not most of the Indian tribes that most people have heard of developed or at least became prominent as the result of direct or indirect interactions with Europeans. Tribes like the Creeks, Choctaws, Seminoles, and many others did not exist as distinct ethnic units before European contact, and probably would never have existed given a different pattern of European settlement. The horse-riding nomadic plains Indians that most people think of when they think of American Indians were also the product of interaction with Europeans. That makes it hard to write a serious Alternate History scenario that involves Indians recognizable to most readers.
Given those problems, I can understand alternate history buffs writing off Indians as a subject for serious alternate history. I beg to differ with that opinion though, and will present a series of exercises in alternate history that will illustrate why. The scenarios range from serious to whimsical. I enjoyed writing all of them and I hope you enjoy reading them.
The title promises Indian victories. What do I mean by that? The alternate history scenarios in this book will have American Indian cultures surviving in significantly larger numbers than in our time-line, for a significantly longer time than in our time-line, and/or with significantly more of the core of their cultures intact than in our time-line.
How could Indians have achieved those kinds of victories? Their best chance would be to not fight the war. If for some reason Europeans were unwilling or unable to invade the New World, Indians would presumably ‘win’. That could have happened due to European conditions or conditions in the New World. Scenarios in the first section will look at both possibilities.
Assuming that the Europeans are in a position to settle the New World, the Indians have to somehow reduce or eliminate the reasons they lost in our time-line. If something made European and African diseases less deadly to American Indians, Indians would have a better shot at winning. Scenarios in section two look at those possibilities.
If somehow Indians closed the technology gap, either before or after contact with the Europeans, they would have a better chance at winning. Section three looks at some of those possibilities.
If Indians managed to avoid ruinous wars between the tribes, they would have a better chance at winning. Section four looks at some of those possibilities.
In some cases, seemingly minor variations in the patterns of European settlements or the geography of the New World would make a huge difference in how well Indian cultures survived. Section five looks at some of those scenarios.
Section six groups together information that doesn’t really fit anywhere else. It contains a Book Review and a whimsical attempt to use alternate history to generate Rider Haggard/Edgar Rice Burroughs-style ‘lost cities’.
Copyright 2001 By Dale R. Cozort
Saturday, March 20, 2010
indian victory celebratios after little big horn battle
http://www.astonisher.com/archives/museum/index_never_found.html
100 Voices: Full List * Crow/Arikara * Sioux/Cheyenne * American * RosebudGuided Tours: Crazy Horse at the Little Bighorn * Crazy Horse at the RosebudFeatures: Who Killed Custer? * Bogus Crazy Horse Photos * Unsung Scouts SagaFeatures: Crazy Horse Surrender Ledger * Winter Count of Crazy Horse's LifeFeatures: Indian Battlefield Tactics * Woman Warriors * Virtual MuseumFeatures: American Atrocities * Indian Atrocities * Little Bighorn Mysteries
WELCOME to Conversations With Crazy Horse Source Materials. This free American history study resource features 100 Voices, the largest and most complete collection of Sioux, Cheyenne, Arapaho, Crow, Arikara and American eye-witness accounts of the Battle of the Little Bighorn available anywhere, in any form, plus a raft of other related eye-witness documents such as The Complete Crazy Horse Surrender Ledger and The Wintercount of Crazy Horse's Life, all globally searchable for the first time ever, right here. Enjoy!
-- B.B.
American soldiers whosebodies were never found...Eyewitness accounts of the Battle of the Little Bighorn
J.E. PorterKilled at the Little Bighorn. His body was never found.
James SturgisKilled at the Little Bighorn. His body was never found.
Henry HarringtonKilled at the Little Bighorn. His body was never found.
Mitch BouyerKilled at the Little Bighorn. His body was never found.
SEVENTH CAVALRY survivor Daniel Kanipe said, "There were 14 men and two officers, Lieutenant Harrington and Lieutenant Sturgis, that never were found." Actually, the missing also included one more officer, Lt. J.E. Porter, and one of the Seventh Cavalry's surgeons, Dr. G. E. Lord. Including Mitch Bouyer, the half-breed interpreter for the Crow scouts, this makes a total of 19 Americans whose bodies were either missing or unidentiable after the battle.
Seventh Cavalry scout George Herendeen added, "The heads of four white soldiers were found in the Sioux camp that had been severed from their trunks, but the bodies could not be found on the battlefield or in the village."
Lieutenant Charles Roe of the Second Cavalry, who was an eye-witness to the condition of the battlefield immediately afterwards, said, "we found in the Indian village a white man's head with a lariat tied to it, which had been dragged around the village until the head was pulled off the body."
According to George Glenn, who was on the Little Bighorn burial detail, one of the heads belonged to Pvt. John E. Armstrong. The head of Custer's favorite scout, Bloody Knife, was similarly severed and paraded through the village on a pole. Bloody Knife was also scalped.
Many of the American dead that could be identified were also hideously mutilated. Tom (Boss) Tweed's "crotch had been split up with an ax and one of his legs thrown up over his shoulder. He was shot with arrows in both eyes." Jim Turley was found with his own knife plunged to the hilt in one eye. An unknown Arikara scout had "his head pounded to pieces."
The corpse of Isaiah Dorman, the black scout, was "very much mutilated," with strong indication that he was tortured. In the end, "the Dakotas had left a kettle full of his own blood close by his head" for his refreshement, should he become thirsty while he died in agony in the hot summer sun.
Lieutenant Donald McIntosh's head was "pounded to jelly," according to Charles Roe, but McIntosh's corpse was identified by the "gutta-percha" sleeve button found nearby. McIntosh's wife had given him the button when the Seventh Cavalry left Fort Lincoln. James Sturgis was not so fortunate. George Glenn said Sturgis's trousers were found, but that was all that could be identified of him.
After the battle, John Ryan said, "we found what appeared to be human bones, and parts of blue uniforms, where the men had been tied to stakes and trees." However, most Sioux and Cheyenne denied that any Americans were held alive after the battle or tortured, but Little Knife said, "One prisoner was taken. He was captured by Rain In The Face, who said he had stripes on his arm." Little Knife said the American prisoner was bound "shag-a-nappe" and killed in the village during the night of June 25.
And there may have been more. Barely three months after the battle when Blackfeet Sioux war chief Kill Eagle was asked about torture, the following rather oblique exchange took place:
Q. Did they burn or torture any of them after the battle was over?
A. There was one became separated from Reno's command and two Cheyennes gave him chase and overtook him and killed him.
-- Bruce BrownJuly 4, 2009Updated August 25, 2009
100 Voices: Full List * Crow/Arikara * Sioux/Cheyenne * American * RosebudGuided Tours: Crazy Horse at the Little Bighorn * Crazy Horse at the RosebudFeatures: Who Killed Custer? * Bogus Crazy Horse Photos * Unsung Scouts SagaFeatures: Crazy Horse Surrender Ledger * Winter Count of Crazy Horse's LifeFeatures: Indian Battlefield Tactics * Woman Warriors * Virtual MuseumFeatures: American Atrocities * Indian Atrocities * Little Bighorn Mysteries
100 Voices: Full List * Crow/Arikara * Sioux/Cheyenne * American * RosebudGuided Tours: Crazy Horse at the Little Bighorn * Crazy Horse at the RosebudFeatures: Who Killed Custer? * Bogus Crazy Horse Photos * Unsung Scouts SagaFeatures: Crazy Horse Surrender Ledger * Winter Count of Crazy Horse's LifeFeatures: Indian Battlefield Tactics * Woman Warriors * Virtual MuseumFeatures: American Atrocities * Indian Atrocities * Little Bighorn Mysteries
WELCOME to Conversations With Crazy Horse Source Materials. This free American history study resource features 100 Voices, the largest and most complete collection of Sioux, Cheyenne, Arapaho, Crow, Arikara and American eye-witness accounts of the Battle of the Little Bighorn available anywhere, in any form, plus a raft of other related eye-witness documents such as The Complete Crazy Horse Surrender Ledger and The Wintercount of Crazy Horse's Life, all globally searchable for the first time ever, right here. Enjoy!
-- B.B.
American soldiers whosebodies were never found...Eyewitness accounts of the Battle of the Little Bighorn
J.E. PorterKilled at the Little Bighorn. His body was never found.
James SturgisKilled at the Little Bighorn. His body was never found.
Henry HarringtonKilled at the Little Bighorn. His body was never found.
Mitch BouyerKilled at the Little Bighorn. His body was never found.
SEVENTH CAVALRY survivor Daniel Kanipe said, "There were 14 men and two officers, Lieutenant Harrington and Lieutenant Sturgis, that never were found." Actually, the missing also included one more officer, Lt. J.E. Porter, and one of the Seventh Cavalry's surgeons, Dr. G. E. Lord. Including Mitch Bouyer, the half-breed interpreter for the Crow scouts, this makes a total of 19 Americans whose bodies were either missing or unidentiable after the battle.
Seventh Cavalry scout George Herendeen added, "The heads of four white soldiers were found in the Sioux camp that had been severed from their trunks, but the bodies could not be found on the battlefield or in the village."
Lieutenant Charles Roe of the Second Cavalry, who was an eye-witness to the condition of the battlefield immediately afterwards, said, "we found in the Indian village a white man's head with a lariat tied to it, which had been dragged around the village until the head was pulled off the body."
According to George Glenn, who was on the Little Bighorn burial detail, one of the heads belonged to Pvt. John E. Armstrong. The head of Custer's favorite scout, Bloody Knife, was similarly severed and paraded through the village on a pole. Bloody Knife was also scalped.
Many of the American dead that could be identified were also hideously mutilated. Tom (Boss) Tweed's "crotch had been split up with an ax and one of his legs thrown up over his shoulder. He was shot with arrows in both eyes." Jim Turley was found with his own knife plunged to the hilt in one eye. An unknown Arikara scout had "his head pounded to pieces."
The corpse of Isaiah Dorman, the black scout, was "very much mutilated," with strong indication that he was tortured. In the end, "the Dakotas had left a kettle full of his own blood close by his head" for his refreshement, should he become thirsty while he died in agony in the hot summer sun.
Lieutenant Donald McIntosh's head was "pounded to jelly," according to Charles Roe, but McIntosh's corpse was identified by the "gutta-percha" sleeve button found nearby. McIntosh's wife had given him the button when the Seventh Cavalry left Fort Lincoln. James Sturgis was not so fortunate. George Glenn said Sturgis's trousers were found, but that was all that could be identified of him.
After the battle, John Ryan said, "we found what appeared to be human bones, and parts of blue uniforms, where the men had been tied to stakes and trees." However, most Sioux and Cheyenne denied that any Americans were held alive after the battle or tortured, but Little Knife said, "One prisoner was taken. He was captured by Rain In The Face, who said he had stripes on his arm." Little Knife said the American prisoner was bound "shag-a-nappe" and killed in the village during the night of June 25.
And there may have been more. Barely three months after the battle when Blackfeet Sioux war chief Kill Eagle was asked about torture, the following rather oblique exchange took place:
Q. Did they burn or torture any of them after the battle was over?
A. There was one became separated from Reno's command and two Cheyennes gave him chase and overtook him and killed him.
-- Bruce BrownJuly 4, 2009Updated August 25, 2009
100 Voices: Full List * Crow/Arikara * Sioux/Cheyenne * American * RosebudGuided Tours: Crazy Horse at the Little Bighorn * Crazy Horse at the RosebudFeatures: Who Killed Custer? * Bogus Crazy Horse Photos * Unsung Scouts SagaFeatures: Crazy Horse Surrender Ledger * Winter Count of Crazy Horse's LifeFeatures: Indian Battlefield Tactics * Woman Warriors * Virtual MuseumFeatures: American Atrocities * Indian Atrocities * Little Bighorn Mysteries
Monday, January 11, 2010
Friday, August 7, 2009
cannibalism in mexico at time of cortez
This is Google's cache of http://www.heretical.com/cannibal/mamerica.html. It is a snapshot of the page as it appeared on Jul 30, 2009 18:04:27 GMT. The current page could have changed in the meantime. Learn more
Text-only version
These search terms are highlighted: huron indians cannibals
HERE BE CANNIBALS
CANNIBALISM IN MIDDLE AMERICA
As well-trained, methodical butchers of the battlefield and as citizens of the land of the Inquisition, Cortés and his men, who arrived in Mexico in 1519, were inured to displays of cruelty and bloodshed. It must have come as no great surprise to them that the Aztecs methodically sacrificed human beings, inasmuch as the Spaniards and other Europeans methodically broke people's bones on the rack, pulled people's arms and legs off in tugs-of-war between horses, and disposed of women accused of witchcraft by burning them at the stake. Still, they were not quite prepared for what they found in Mexico.
Nowhere else in the world had there developed a state-sponsored religion whose art, architecture and ritual were so thoroughly dominated by violence, decay, death and disease. Nowhere else were walls and plazas of great temples and palaces reserved for such a concentrated display of jaws, fangs, claws, talons, bones and gaping death heads. The eyewitness accounts of Cortés and his fellow conquistador, Bernal Díaz, leave no doubt concerning the ecclesiastical meaning of the dreadful visages portrayed in stone. The Aztec gods ate people. They ate human hearts and they drank human blood. And the declared function of the Aztec priesthood was to provide fresh human hearts and human blood in order to prevent the remorseless deities from becoming angry and crippling, sickening, withering, and burning the whole world.
The Spaniards first glimpsed the inside of a major Aztec temple as the invited guests of Moctezuma, the last of the Aztec kings. Moctezuma had not yet made up his mind concerning Cortés's intentions – an error which was shortly to prove fatal for him – when he invited the Spaniards up 114 steps to the twin temples of Uitzilopochtli and Tlaloc, which stood at the top of Tenochtitlán's tallest pyramid in the centre of what is today Mexico City. As they mounted the steps, wrote Bernal Díaz, other temples and shrines ‘all gleaming white’ came into view. In the open space at the top of the pyramid ‘the great stones stood on which they placed the poor Indians for sacrifice.’ Here also was ‘a bulky image like a dragon, and other evil figures and much blood shed that very day.’ Then Moctezuma let them see the image of Uitzilopochtli, with its ‘very broad face and monstrous and terrible eyes,’ before which ‘they were burning the hearts of three Indians whom they had sacrificed that day.’ The walls and floor of the temple ‘were so splashed and encrusted with blood that they were black’ and the ‘whole place stank vilely.’ In Tlaloc's temple, too, everything was covered with blood, ‘both walls and altar, and the stench was such that we could hardly wait for the moment to get out of it.’
The main source of food for the Aztec gods was prisoners of war, who were marched up the steps of the pyramids to the temples, seized by four priests, spread-eagled backward over the stone altar, and slit open from one side of the chest to the other with an obsidian knife wielded by a fifth priest. The victim's heart – usually described as still beating – was then wrenched out and burned as an offering. The body was rolled down the pyramid steps, which were built deliberately steep to accommodate this function.
Occasionally some sacrificial victims – distinguished warriors, perhaps – were given the privilege of defending themselves for a while before they were killed. Bernardino De Sahagún, the greatest historian and ethnographer of the Aztecs, described these mock battles as follows:
... they slew other captives, battling with them – these being tied, by the waist, with a rope which passed through the socket of a round stone, as of a mill; and [the rope] was long enough so that [the captive] might walk about the complete circumference of the stone. And they gave him arms with which he might do battle; and four warriors came against him with swords and shields, and one by one they exchanged sword blows with him until they vanquished him.
Apparently in the Aztec state of two or three centuries earlier the king himself was not beyond the task of dispatching a few victims with his own hands. Here is an account by Diego Durán of the legendary slaughter of prisoners captured among the Mixtecs:
The five priests entered and claimed the prisoner who stood first in the line... Each prisoner they took to the place where the king stood and, when they had forced him to stand upon the stone which was the figure and likeness of the sun, they threw him upon his back. One took him by the right arm, another by the left, one by his left foot, another by his right, while the fifth priest tied his neck with a cord and held him down so that he could not move.
The king lifted the knife on high and made a gash in the breast. Having opened it he extracted the heart and raised it high with his hand as an offering to the sun. When the heart had cooled he tossed it into the circular depression, taking some of the blood in his hand and sprinkling it in the direction of the sun.
Not all the victims were prisoners of war. Substantial numbers of slaves were also sacrificed. In addition, certain youths and maidens were chosen to impersonate specific gods and goddesses. These were treated with great care and tenderness throughout the year preceding their execution. In the Dresden Codex, a sixteenth-century book written in Nahuatl, the language of the Aztecs, there is this account of the death of a woman who played the role of the goddess Uixtociuatl:
And after they had slain the captives, only [then] Uixtociuatl['s impersonator] followed; she came only at the last. They came to the end and finished only with her.
And when this was done, thereupon they laid her down upon the offering stone. They stretched her out upon her back. They laid hold of her; they pulled and stretched out her arms and legs, bending [up] her breast greatly, bending [down] her back, and stretching down her head taut, toward the earth. And they bore down upon her neck, with the tightly pressed snout of a sword fish, barbed, spiny; spined on either side.
And the slayer stood there; he stood up. Thereupon he cut open her breast.
And when he opened her breast, the blood gushed up high; it welled up far as it poured forth, as it boiled up.
And when this was done, then he raised her heart as an offering [to the god] and placed it in the green jar, which was called the green stone jar.
And as this was done, loudly were the trumpets blown. And when it was over, then they lowered the body and the heart of [the likeness of] Uixtociuatl, covered by a precious mantle.
But such displays of reverence were few and far between. The great majority of victims did not walk joyfully up the steps of the pyramid, soothed by the prospect that they were about to make some god happy. Many of them had to be dragged by the hair:
When the masters of the captives took their slaves to the temple where they were to slay them, they took them by the hair. And when they took them up the steps of the pyramid, some of the captives swooned, and their masters pulled them up and dragged them by the hair to the sacrificial stone where they were to die.
The Aztecs were not the first Mesoamericans to sacrifice human beings. We know that the Toltec and the Maya engaged in the practice, and it is a reasonable inference that all steep-sided, flat-topped Mesoamerican pyramids were intended to serve as a stage for the spectacle in which human victims were fed to the gods. Nor was human sacrifice an invention of state-level religions. To judge from the evidence of band and village societies throughout the Americas and in many other parts of the world, human sacrifice long antedated the rise of state religions.
From Brazil to the Great Plains, American Indian societies ritually dispatched human victims in order to achieve certain kinds of benefits. Virtually every element of Aztec ritual was foreshadowed in the beliefs and practices of band and village peoples. Even the preoccupation with the surgical removal of the heart had its precedents.
The Iroquois, for example, vied with each other for the privilege of eating the heart of a brave prisoner so that they could acquire some of his courage. Everywhere, male prisoners were the chief victims. Before being killed, they were made to run a gauntlet, or were beaten, stoned, burned, mutilated, or subjected to other forms of torture and abuse. Sometimes they were tied to stakes and given a club with which to defend themselves against their tormentors. Occasionally one or two prisoners were kept for extended periods and provided with good food and concubines.
The ritual sacrifice of prisoners of war among band and village peoples was usually followed by the eating of all or part of the victim's body....
We can see that the unique contribution of [the Aztec] religion was not the introduction of human sacrifice but its elaboration along certain destructive pathways. Most notably, the Aztecs transformed human sacrifice from an occasional by-product of luck on the battlefield to a routine in which not a day went by when someone was not spread-eagled on the altars of the great temples such as Uitzilopochtli and Tlaloc. And sacrifices also took place at dozens of lesser temples ranging down to what might be called neighbourhood chapels. One such neighbourhood facility – a low, circular, flat-topped structure about twenty feet in diameter – was excavated during the construction of Mexico City's subway. It now stands, preserved behind glass, at one of the busiest stations. For the less-than-total enlightenment of the crowds of commuters who pass it every day, an accompanying plaque notes only that the ancient Mexicans were ‘very religious.’
Since the Aztec armies were thousands of times bigger than those of the Huron or the Tupinamba, they could capture thousands of prisoners in a single battle. In addition to daily sacrifices of small numbers of prisoners and slaves at major and minor shrines, then, mass sacrifices involving hundreds and thousands of victims could be carried out to commemorate special events. The Spanish chroniclers were told, for example, that at the dedication in 1487 of the great pyramid of Tenochtitlán four lines of prisoners stretching for two miles each were sacrificed by a team of executioners who worked night and day for four days. Allotting two minutes per sacrifice, the demographer and historian Sherburne Cook estimated that the number of victims associated with that single event was 14,100. The scale of these rituals could be dismissed as exaggerations were it not for the encounters of Bernal Díaz and Andrés de Tápia with methodically racked and hence easily counted rows of human skulls in the plazas of the Aztec cities. Díaz writes that in the plaza of Xocotlan
there were piles of human skulls so regularly arranged that one could count them, and I estimated them at more than a hundred thousand.
I repeat again there were more than one hundred thousand of them.
Of his encounter with the great skull rack in the centre of Tenochtitlán, Tápia wrote:
The poles were separated from each other by a little less than a vara [approximately a yard's length], and were crowded with cross sticks from top to bottom, and on each cross stick were five skulls impaled through the temples: and the writer and a certain Gonzalo de Umbría, counted the cross sticks and multiplying by five heads per cross stick from pole to pole, as I said, we found that there were 136 thousand heads.
But that was not all. Tápia also describes two tall towers made entirely out of skulls held together by lime in which there was an uncountable number of crania and jaws....
So intent were the Aztecs on bringing back prisoners to be sacrificed that they would frequently refrain from pressing a military advantage for fear that they would kill too many enemy troops before terms of surrender could be arranged. This tactic cost them dearly in their engagements with Cortés's troops, who from the Aztec point of view seemed to be irrationally intent upon killing everyone in sight....
Conventional descriptions of the Aztec ritual of sacrifice end with the victim's body tumbling down the pyramid. Blinded by the image of a still-beating heart held aloft in the hands of the priest, one can easily forget to ask what happened to the body when it came to rest at the bottom of the steps. Michael Harner of the New School has pursued this question with greater intelligence and courage then anyone else. Throughout the rest of this chapter I shall draw heavily upon his work. He alone deserves the credit for solving the riddle of Aztec sacrifice.
As Harner points out, there really is no mystery concerning what happened to the bodies since all the eyewitness accounts are in fundamental agreement. Anyone with a knowledge of how the Tupinamba, the Huron and other village societies disposed of their sacrificial victims should be able to come to the same conclusion: the victims were eaten. Bernardino De Sahagún's description leaves little room for doubt:
After having torn their hearts from them and poured the blood into a gourd vessel, which the master of the slain man himself received, they started the body rolling down the pyramid steps. It came to rest upon a small square below. There some old men, whom they called Quaquacuiltin, laid hold of it and carried it to their tribal temple, where they dismembered it and divided it up in order to eat it.
De Sahagún makes the same points repeatedly:
After they had slain them and torn out their hearts, they took them away gently, rolling them down the steps. When they had reached the bottom, they cut off their heads and inserted a rod though them, and they carried the bodies to the houses which they called calpulli, where they divided them up in order to eat them.
... and they took out their hearts and struck off their heads. And later they divided up all the body among themselves and ate it...
Diego Durán gives us a similar description:
Once the heart had been wrenched out it was offered to the sun and blood sprinkled toward the solar deity. Imitating the descent of the sun in the west the corpse was toppled down the steps of the pyramid. After the sacrifice the warriors celebrated a great feast with much dancing, ceremonial and cannibalism.
These descriptions clarify a number of points about the Aztec warfare-sacrifice-cannibalism complex. Harner notes that each prisoner had an owner – probably the officer in charge of the soldiers who actually made the capture. When the prisoner was brought back to Tenochtitián, he was housed in the owner's compound. We know little about how long he was kept there or how he was treated, but one can guess that he was fed enough tortillas to keep him from losing weight. It even seems likely that a powerful military commander would have kept several dozen prisoners on hand, fattening them up in preparation for special feast days or important family events such as births, deaths or marriages. When the time for sacrifice approached, the prisoners may have been tortured for the instruction and amusement of the owner's family and neighbours. On the day of the sacrifice, the owner and his soldiers no doubt escorted the prisoner to the foot of the pyramid to watch the proceedings in the company of other dignitaries whose prisoners were being sacrificed on the same day. After the heart was removed, the body was not tumbled down the steps so much as pushed down by attendants, since the steps were not steep enough to keep the body moving all the way from top to bottom without getting stuck. The old men, whom De Sahagún refers to as Quaquacuiltin, claimed the body and took it back to the owner's compound, where they cut it up and prepared the limbs for cooking – the favourite recipe being a stew flavoured with peppers and tomatoes. De Sahagún states that they put ‘squash blossoms’ in the flesh. The victim's blood, as De Sahagún notes, was collected in a gourd vessel by the priests and delivered to the owner. We know the heart was put into a brazier and burned along with copal incense, but whether or not it was burned to ashes remains unclear. There is also some question concerning the fate of the trunk with its organs and the head with its brains. Eventually, the skull ended up on display on one of the racks described by Andrés Tápia and Bernal Díaz. But since most cannibals relish brains, we can assume that these were removed – perhaps by the priests or spectators – before the skulls ended up on exhibit. Similarly, although according to Díaz the trunk was tossed to the carnivorous mammals, birds and snakes kept in the royal zoo, I suspect that the zoo keepers – Tápia says that there were large numbers of them – first removed most of the flesh.
I have been pursuing the fate of the victim's body in order to establish the point that Aztec cannibalism was not a perfunctory tasting of ceremonial titbits. All edible parts were used in a manner strictly comparable to the consumption of the flesh of domestic animals. The Aztec priests can legitimately be described as ritual slaughterers in a state-sponsored system geared to the production and redistribution of substantial amounts of animal protein in the form of human flesh. Of course, the priests had other duties, but none had greater practical significance than their butchery.
Marvin Harris, Cannibals and Kings: The Origin of Cultures, Glasgow, 1978, pp. 110-124
Main Directory
–– The
Text-only version
These search terms are highlighted: huron indians cannibals
HERE BE CANNIBALS
CANNIBALISM IN MIDDLE AMERICA
As well-trained, methodical butchers of the battlefield and as citizens of the land of the Inquisition, Cortés and his men, who arrived in Mexico in 1519, were inured to displays of cruelty and bloodshed. It must have come as no great surprise to them that the Aztecs methodically sacrificed human beings, inasmuch as the Spaniards and other Europeans methodically broke people's bones on the rack, pulled people's arms and legs off in tugs-of-war between horses, and disposed of women accused of witchcraft by burning them at the stake. Still, they were not quite prepared for what they found in Mexico.
Nowhere else in the world had there developed a state-sponsored religion whose art, architecture and ritual were so thoroughly dominated by violence, decay, death and disease. Nowhere else were walls and plazas of great temples and palaces reserved for such a concentrated display of jaws, fangs, claws, talons, bones and gaping death heads. The eyewitness accounts of Cortés and his fellow conquistador, Bernal Díaz, leave no doubt concerning the ecclesiastical meaning of the dreadful visages portrayed in stone. The Aztec gods ate people. They ate human hearts and they drank human blood. And the declared function of the Aztec priesthood was to provide fresh human hearts and human blood in order to prevent the remorseless deities from becoming angry and crippling, sickening, withering, and burning the whole world.
The Spaniards first glimpsed the inside of a major Aztec temple as the invited guests of Moctezuma, the last of the Aztec kings. Moctezuma had not yet made up his mind concerning Cortés's intentions – an error which was shortly to prove fatal for him – when he invited the Spaniards up 114 steps to the twin temples of Uitzilopochtli and Tlaloc, which stood at the top of Tenochtitlán's tallest pyramid in the centre of what is today Mexico City. As they mounted the steps, wrote Bernal Díaz, other temples and shrines ‘all gleaming white’ came into view. In the open space at the top of the pyramid ‘the great stones stood on which they placed the poor Indians for sacrifice.’ Here also was ‘a bulky image like a dragon, and other evil figures and much blood shed that very day.’ Then Moctezuma let them see the image of Uitzilopochtli, with its ‘very broad face and monstrous and terrible eyes,’ before which ‘they were burning the hearts of three Indians whom they had sacrificed that day.’ The walls and floor of the temple ‘were so splashed and encrusted with blood that they were black’ and the ‘whole place stank vilely.’ In Tlaloc's temple, too, everything was covered with blood, ‘both walls and altar, and the stench was such that we could hardly wait for the moment to get out of it.’
The main source of food for the Aztec gods was prisoners of war, who were marched up the steps of the pyramids to the temples, seized by four priests, spread-eagled backward over the stone altar, and slit open from one side of the chest to the other with an obsidian knife wielded by a fifth priest. The victim's heart – usually described as still beating – was then wrenched out and burned as an offering. The body was rolled down the pyramid steps, which were built deliberately steep to accommodate this function.
Occasionally some sacrificial victims – distinguished warriors, perhaps – were given the privilege of defending themselves for a while before they were killed. Bernardino De Sahagún, the greatest historian and ethnographer of the Aztecs, described these mock battles as follows:
... they slew other captives, battling with them – these being tied, by the waist, with a rope which passed through the socket of a round stone, as of a mill; and [the rope] was long enough so that [the captive] might walk about the complete circumference of the stone. And they gave him arms with which he might do battle; and four warriors came against him with swords and shields, and one by one they exchanged sword blows with him until they vanquished him.
Apparently in the Aztec state of two or three centuries earlier the king himself was not beyond the task of dispatching a few victims with his own hands. Here is an account by Diego Durán of the legendary slaughter of prisoners captured among the Mixtecs:
The five priests entered and claimed the prisoner who stood first in the line... Each prisoner they took to the place where the king stood and, when they had forced him to stand upon the stone which was the figure and likeness of the sun, they threw him upon his back. One took him by the right arm, another by the left, one by his left foot, another by his right, while the fifth priest tied his neck with a cord and held him down so that he could not move.
The king lifted the knife on high and made a gash in the breast. Having opened it he extracted the heart and raised it high with his hand as an offering to the sun. When the heart had cooled he tossed it into the circular depression, taking some of the blood in his hand and sprinkling it in the direction of the sun.
Not all the victims were prisoners of war. Substantial numbers of slaves were also sacrificed. In addition, certain youths and maidens were chosen to impersonate specific gods and goddesses. These were treated with great care and tenderness throughout the year preceding their execution. In the Dresden Codex, a sixteenth-century book written in Nahuatl, the language of the Aztecs, there is this account of the death of a woman who played the role of the goddess Uixtociuatl:
And after they had slain the captives, only [then] Uixtociuatl['s impersonator] followed; she came only at the last. They came to the end and finished only with her.
And when this was done, thereupon they laid her down upon the offering stone. They stretched her out upon her back. They laid hold of her; they pulled and stretched out her arms and legs, bending [up] her breast greatly, bending [down] her back, and stretching down her head taut, toward the earth. And they bore down upon her neck, with the tightly pressed snout of a sword fish, barbed, spiny; spined on either side.
And the slayer stood there; he stood up. Thereupon he cut open her breast.
And when he opened her breast, the blood gushed up high; it welled up far as it poured forth, as it boiled up.
And when this was done, then he raised her heart as an offering [to the god] and placed it in the green jar, which was called the green stone jar.
And as this was done, loudly were the trumpets blown. And when it was over, then they lowered the body and the heart of [the likeness of] Uixtociuatl, covered by a precious mantle.
But such displays of reverence were few and far between. The great majority of victims did not walk joyfully up the steps of the pyramid, soothed by the prospect that they were about to make some god happy. Many of them had to be dragged by the hair:
When the masters of the captives took their slaves to the temple where they were to slay them, they took them by the hair. And when they took them up the steps of the pyramid, some of the captives swooned, and their masters pulled them up and dragged them by the hair to the sacrificial stone where they were to die.
The Aztecs were not the first Mesoamericans to sacrifice human beings. We know that the Toltec and the Maya engaged in the practice, and it is a reasonable inference that all steep-sided, flat-topped Mesoamerican pyramids were intended to serve as a stage for the spectacle in which human victims were fed to the gods. Nor was human sacrifice an invention of state-level religions. To judge from the evidence of band and village societies throughout the Americas and in many other parts of the world, human sacrifice long antedated the rise of state religions.
From Brazil to the Great Plains, American Indian societies ritually dispatched human victims in order to achieve certain kinds of benefits. Virtually every element of Aztec ritual was foreshadowed in the beliefs and practices of band and village peoples. Even the preoccupation with the surgical removal of the heart had its precedents.
The Iroquois, for example, vied with each other for the privilege of eating the heart of a brave prisoner so that they could acquire some of his courage. Everywhere, male prisoners were the chief victims. Before being killed, they were made to run a gauntlet, or were beaten, stoned, burned, mutilated, or subjected to other forms of torture and abuse. Sometimes they were tied to stakes and given a club with which to defend themselves against their tormentors. Occasionally one or two prisoners were kept for extended periods and provided with good food and concubines.
The ritual sacrifice of prisoners of war among band and village peoples was usually followed by the eating of all or part of the victim's body....
We can see that the unique contribution of [the Aztec] religion was not the introduction of human sacrifice but its elaboration along certain destructive pathways. Most notably, the Aztecs transformed human sacrifice from an occasional by-product of luck on the battlefield to a routine in which not a day went by when someone was not spread-eagled on the altars of the great temples such as Uitzilopochtli and Tlaloc. And sacrifices also took place at dozens of lesser temples ranging down to what might be called neighbourhood chapels. One such neighbourhood facility – a low, circular, flat-topped structure about twenty feet in diameter – was excavated during the construction of Mexico City's subway. It now stands, preserved behind glass, at one of the busiest stations. For the less-than-total enlightenment of the crowds of commuters who pass it every day, an accompanying plaque notes only that the ancient Mexicans were ‘very religious.’
Since the Aztec armies were thousands of times bigger than those of the Huron or the Tupinamba, they could capture thousands of prisoners in a single battle. In addition to daily sacrifices of small numbers of prisoners and slaves at major and minor shrines, then, mass sacrifices involving hundreds and thousands of victims could be carried out to commemorate special events. The Spanish chroniclers were told, for example, that at the dedication in 1487 of the great pyramid of Tenochtitlán four lines of prisoners stretching for two miles each were sacrificed by a team of executioners who worked night and day for four days. Allotting two minutes per sacrifice, the demographer and historian Sherburne Cook estimated that the number of victims associated with that single event was 14,100. The scale of these rituals could be dismissed as exaggerations were it not for the encounters of Bernal Díaz and Andrés de Tápia with methodically racked and hence easily counted rows of human skulls in the plazas of the Aztec cities. Díaz writes that in the plaza of Xocotlan
there were piles of human skulls so regularly arranged that one could count them, and I estimated them at more than a hundred thousand.
I repeat again there were more than one hundred thousand of them.
Of his encounter with the great skull rack in the centre of Tenochtitlán, Tápia wrote:
The poles were separated from each other by a little less than a vara [approximately a yard's length], and were crowded with cross sticks from top to bottom, and on each cross stick were five skulls impaled through the temples: and the writer and a certain Gonzalo de Umbría, counted the cross sticks and multiplying by five heads per cross stick from pole to pole, as I said, we found that there were 136 thousand heads.
But that was not all. Tápia also describes two tall towers made entirely out of skulls held together by lime in which there was an uncountable number of crania and jaws....
So intent were the Aztecs on bringing back prisoners to be sacrificed that they would frequently refrain from pressing a military advantage for fear that they would kill too many enemy troops before terms of surrender could be arranged. This tactic cost them dearly in their engagements with Cortés's troops, who from the Aztec point of view seemed to be irrationally intent upon killing everyone in sight....
Conventional descriptions of the Aztec ritual of sacrifice end with the victim's body tumbling down the pyramid. Blinded by the image of a still-beating heart held aloft in the hands of the priest, one can easily forget to ask what happened to the body when it came to rest at the bottom of the steps. Michael Harner of the New School has pursued this question with greater intelligence and courage then anyone else. Throughout the rest of this chapter I shall draw heavily upon his work. He alone deserves the credit for solving the riddle of Aztec sacrifice.
As Harner points out, there really is no mystery concerning what happened to the bodies since all the eyewitness accounts are in fundamental agreement. Anyone with a knowledge of how the Tupinamba, the Huron and other village societies disposed of their sacrificial victims should be able to come to the same conclusion: the victims were eaten. Bernardino De Sahagún's description leaves little room for doubt:
After having torn their hearts from them and poured the blood into a gourd vessel, which the master of the slain man himself received, they started the body rolling down the pyramid steps. It came to rest upon a small square below. There some old men, whom they called Quaquacuiltin, laid hold of it and carried it to their tribal temple, where they dismembered it and divided it up in order to eat it.
De Sahagún makes the same points repeatedly:
After they had slain them and torn out their hearts, they took them away gently, rolling them down the steps. When they had reached the bottom, they cut off their heads and inserted a rod though them, and they carried the bodies to the houses which they called calpulli, where they divided them up in order to eat them.
... and they took out their hearts and struck off their heads. And later they divided up all the body among themselves and ate it...
Diego Durán gives us a similar description:
Once the heart had been wrenched out it was offered to the sun and blood sprinkled toward the solar deity. Imitating the descent of the sun in the west the corpse was toppled down the steps of the pyramid. After the sacrifice the warriors celebrated a great feast with much dancing, ceremonial and cannibalism.
These descriptions clarify a number of points about the Aztec warfare-sacrifice-cannibalism complex. Harner notes that each prisoner had an owner – probably the officer in charge of the soldiers who actually made the capture. When the prisoner was brought back to Tenochtitián, he was housed in the owner's compound. We know little about how long he was kept there or how he was treated, but one can guess that he was fed enough tortillas to keep him from losing weight. It even seems likely that a powerful military commander would have kept several dozen prisoners on hand, fattening them up in preparation for special feast days or important family events such as births, deaths or marriages. When the time for sacrifice approached, the prisoners may have been tortured for the instruction and amusement of the owner's family and neighbours. On the day of the sacrifice, the owner and his soldiers no doubt escorted the prisoner to the foot of the pyramid to watch the proceedings in the company of other dignitaries whose prisoners were being sacrificed on the same day. After the heart was removed, the body was not tumbled down the steps so much as pushed down by attendants, since the steps were not steep enough to keep the body moving all the way from top to bottom without getting stuck. The old men, whom De Sahagún refers to as Quaquacuiltin, claimed the body and took it back to the owner's compound, where they cut it up and prepared the limbs for cooking – the favourite recipe being a stew flavoured with peppers and tomatoes. De Sahagún states that they put ‘squash blossoms’ in the flesh. The victim's blood, as De Sahagún notes, was collected in a gourd vessel by the priests and delivered to the owner. We know the heart was put into a brazier and burned along with copal incense, but whether or not it was burned to ashes remains unclear. There is also some question concerning the fate of the trunk with its organs and the head with its brains. Eventually, the skull ended up on display on one of the racks described by Andrés Tápia and Bernal Díaz. But since most cannibals relish brains, we can assume that these were removed – perhaps by the priests or spectators – before the skulls ended up on exhibit. Similarly, although according to Díaz the trunk was tossed to the carnivorous mammals, birds and snakes kept in the royal zoo, I suspect that the zoo keepers – Tápia says that there were large numbers of them – first removed most of the flesh.
I have been pursuing the fate of the victim's body in order to establish the point that Aztec cannibalism was not a perfunctory tasting of ceremonial titbits. All edible parts were used in a manner strictly comparable to the consumption of the flesh of domestic animals. The Aztec priests can legitimately be described as ritual slaughterers in a state-sponsored system geared to the production and redistribution of substantial amounts of animal protein in the form of human flesh. Of course, the priests had other duties, but none had greater practical significance than their butchery.
Marvin Harris, Cannibals and Kings: The Origin of Cultures, Glasgow, 1978, pp. 110-124
Main Directory
–– The
Sunday, April 26, 2009
http://www-bms.bastrop.isd.tenet.edu/bcm/Westernroomcannibalism.html
Tonkawa Cannibalism
Accounts of Tonkawa cannibalism in graphic detail are abundent in historical sourses. Noah Smithwick lived among the Tonkawas and recalled a cannibal feast on Webber's Prairie:
After killing and scalping a Comanche, the Tonkawas were on the vengeance trail with a company of revently despoiled Texans, their allies refused to persue the cause, `further saying they must return home to celebrate the event,' which they accordingly did so by a feast and scalp dance. Having slashing-off the flesh of the dead Comanche meat, together with alot of corn and potatoes. When the stew was sufficiently cooked and cooled, to allow it to be ladled out with their hands, the whole tribe gathered around, dripping it up with their hands and eating it greedily. Having gorged themselves, they lay down and slept till night, when the entertainment was concluded with a Scalp Dance.
-a real story from the TONKAWA exibit in the Western Room at the Bastrop County Museum.
Back to the Western Room
Tonkawa Cannibalism
Accounts of Tonkawa cannibalism in graphic detail are abundent in historical sourses. Noah Smithwick lived among the Tonkawas and recalled a cannibal feast on Webber's Prairie:
After killing and scalping a Comanche, the Tonkawas were on the vengeance trail with a company of revently despoiled Texans, their allies refused to persue the cause, `further saying they must return home to celebrate the event,' which they accordingly did so by a feast and scalp dance. Having slashing-off the flesh of the dead Comanche meat, together with alot of corn and potatoes. When the stew was sufficiently cooked and cooled, to allow it to be ladled out with their hands, the whole tribe gathered around, dripping it up with their hands and eating it greedily. Having gorged themselves, they lay down and slept till night, when the entertainment was concluded with a Scalp Dance.
-a real story from the TONKAWA exibit in the Western Room at the Bastrop County Museum.
Back to the Western Room
Friday, September 19, 2008
The beautiful Jane McCrea...
Results 21 - 40 of about 147,000 for el Festival Erótico. (0.07 seconds)
... cancelaciones en el Festival de ...
270 x 326 - 39k - jpg
vesselinakasarova.blogspot.com ... el Festival Erótico de Bilbao, ...
300 x 450 - 26k - jpg
www.elmundo.es El festival erótico más conocido de ...
331 x 294 - 13k - jpg
elblogsensual.com Público en el XI Festival ...
626 x 333 - 89k
www.andaluciaimagen.com
Poca ropa en el Festival de Cine ...
560 x 373 - 38k - jpg
www.elespectador.com nauni69 en el festival internacional ...
130 x 97 - 4k - jpg
www.metacafe.com Festival de Cine Erótico 2007
333 x 500 - 57k
flickr.com
[ More from flickr.com ] El Festival Erótico ...
267 x 400 - 37k - jpg
www.cosasdemadrid.es
[Alfredo Kraus en el festival de ...
250 x 417 - 30k - jpg
mondopulpo.blogspot.com Tetazas en el Festival del Sexo de ...
450 x 405 - 31k - jpg
www.sexo-gratis.es ... en el Festival Erótico de
250 x 250 - 11k
www.elpais.com
[ More from www.elpais.com ] ... el Festival Erotico de Barcelona
320 x 426 - 21k - jpg
www.putalocura.com
[ More from www.putalocura.com ]
Festival Erotico
450 x 294 - 48k - jpg
www.estrellasdelporno.com El Festival Internacional de Cine ...
412 x 300 - 36k - jpg
www.libertadsexual.es Así pueden escucharse ambos, y el ...
560 x 400 - 38k - jpg
vesselinakasarova.blogspot.com Festival Erótico de Barcelona en ...
500 x 333 - 60k - jpg
www.elconfidencial.com
Festival de Cine Erótico 2007
500 x 333 - 47k
flickr.com El festival erotico que se celebra ...
1024 x 768 - 279k - jpg
blog.sorayaricox.com El Festival Internacional de Cine ...
290 x 378 - 20k - jpg
www.actualidadcine.com spika festival erotico barcelona
1600 x 1200 - 230k - jpg
bp3.blogger.com
Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
====renacting the famous event
... cancelaciones en el Festival de ...
270 x 326 - 39k - jpg
vesselinakasarova.blogspot.com ... el Festival Erótico de Bilbao, ...
300 x 450 - 26k - jpg
www.elmundo.es El festival erótico más conocido de ...
331 x 294 - 13k - jpg
elblogsensual.com Público en el XI Festival ...
626 x 333 - 89k
www.andaluciaimagen.com
Poca ropa en el Festival de Cine ...
560 x 373 - 38k - jpg
www.elespectador.com nauni69 en el festival internacional ...
130 x 97 - 4k - jpg
www.metacafe.com Festival de Cine Erótico 2007
333 x 500 - 57k
flickr.com
[ More from flickr.com ] El Festival Erótico ...
267 x 400 - 37k - jpg
www.cosasdemadrid.es
[Alfredo Kraus en el festival de ...
250 x 417 - 30k - jpg
mondopulpo.blogspot.com Tetazas en el Festival del Sexo de ...
450 x 405 - 31k - jpg
www.sexo-gratis.es ... en el Festival Erótico de
250 x 250 - 11k
www.elpais.com
[ More from www.elpais.com ] ... el Festival Erotico de Barcelona
320 x 426 - 21k - jpg
www.putalocura.com
[ More from www.putalocura.com ]
Festival Erotico
450 x 294 - 48k - jpg
www.estrellasdelporno.com El Festival Internacional de Cine ...
412 x 300 - 36k - jpg
www.libertadsexual.es Así pueden escucharse ambos, y el ...
560 x 400 - 38k - jpg
vesselinakasarova.blogspot.com Festival Erótico de Barcelona en ...
500 x 333 - 60k - jpg
www.elconfidencial.com
Festival de Cine Erótico 2007
500 x 333 - 47k
flickr.com El festival erotico que se celebra ...
1024 x 768 - 279k - jpg
blog.sorayaricox.com El Festival Internacional de Cine ...
290 x 378 - 20k - jpg
www.actualidadcine.com spika festival erotico barcelona
1600 x 1200 - 230k - jpg
bp3.blogger.com
Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
====renacting the famous event
Kiss
Kiss
www.attheeasterndoor.com
18th Century Native Reenacting
Photos curtiousy of Jennifer Julich
Uploaded by MExadian DevIL on 15 Sep 08, 7.22PM PDT.
www.attheeasterndoor.com
18th Century Native Reenacting
Photos curtiousy of Jennifer Julich
Uploaded by MExadian DevIL on 15 Sep 08, 7.22PM PDT.
Wednesday, August 13, 2008
Sunday, April 6, 2008
Saturday, March 29, 2008
Wednesday, March 26, 2008
Clip of Tyler Michael Jonsson in
good indian attack, with breechxliort tmahawksm adn scalping a massacre as the fren ch watch
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)